Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Stephen J. Adler's "The Jury: Disorder In The Courts". Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
7 pages in length. Stephen J. Adler's The Jury: Disorder in the Courts illustrates quite clearly how the American judicial system has ruptured an integral component of its allegedly fair and impartial sequence: the jury. At issue is the means by which Adler contends jurors are selected and dismissed, as well as how uneducated far too many of them are as to a given case's critical factors. In essence, Adler wrote this book in order to draw attention to how the phrase 'jury of one's peers' is often the exact opposite and how the entire process – from calling people to jury duty to finding out why jurors voted a particular way at trial's end – has trickled down to reflect a substandard representation of society as a whole. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCadler.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and impartial sequence: the jury. At issue is the means by which Adler (1995) contends jurors are selected and dismissed, as well as how uneducated far too many of
them are as to a given cases critical factors. In essence, Adler (1995) wrote this book in order to draw attention to how the phrase jury of ones peers
is often the exact opposite and how the entire process - from calling people to jury duty to finding out why jurors voted a particular way at trials end -
has trickled down to reflect a substandard representation of society as a whole. II. THE DEMISE OF JUDICIAL ACCURACY It used to be that a defendant could count upon
having twelve reasonably bright, educated and socially adept people in charge of deciding his fate. Now, however, the extent to which contemporary juries are filled with incompetent, prejudiced and
socially dissimilar individuals speaks to a severe breakdown in the call for civic duty. "First, the most competent citizens are permitted to escape the jury pool. The pool is
whittled down further by peremptory challenges, which allow lawyers to strike a potential juror from the panel without giving reasons. The lawyers have reasons, of course, often based on stereotypes
of race, gender, age or income that lead them to believe a particular candidate will disfavor their client. Then the trial begins, when jurors face complicated testimony and evidence that
judges and lawyers do little to help them understand" (Adler, 1995, p. PG). Adler (1995) attempts to get to the ground floor of such a tremendous collapse in standard
jury protocol by examining a number of high profile cases where the juries, more times than not, made as much of a front page story as the defendants themselves.
...