Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Is The Japanese Manufacturing System Appropriate In The U.S.. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 4 page paper. Manufacturing in the U.S. has been declining for years in volume and quality. This essay comments on possible reasons for that situation. The essay also compares some of the aspects of the manufacturing system of Japanese and American companies and ends with a conclusion. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MM12_PGmfjpam.RTF
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
factories and plants, labor costs, unions unwilling to truly negotiate, and the trade deficit as evidence of this poor state of affairs (Hiranyavasit, 2000). Other experts believe Americas competitiveness in
the market is directly related to the management strategies in U.S. companies (Hiranyavasit, 2000). In reality, it is probably a combination of factors. The loss of a strong manufacturing sector
in the U.S. does not mean that all companies are riddled with the challenges just identified. Major success stories abound, consider companies like Microsoft, Intel, Dell, Compaq and many others
who are leaders in their industries. As for management, each company is really managed very differently, for instance, Gates managed Microsoft differently than Grove managed Intel and for many years,
Jack Welch managed GE differently than these other examples (Heller, 2005). This would give credence to the supposition that Americas manufacturing competitiveness depends on the way the leaders lead and
the managers manage. In the 1980s, the American manufacturing sector was in such a state of disarray that many began looking towards the success of Japanese companies. A large number
of American companies began adopting at least some of the Japanese methods in their own companies. This was such an issue in the U.S. that in 1980, NBC developed a
documentary that asked why American manufacturing enterprises could not be as successful as Japanese enterprises (Heller, 2005). Books about Japanese processes and procedures flooded the market. The Japanese had
adopted the principles offered by W. Edwards Deming, which were based on quality, continuous improvement, and employee empowerment. Demings approach which came to be called Total Quality Management is far
more complex than that simple explanation would suggest but this was the difference. When Deming developed and published his work about improving quality shortly after the war, nobody in the
...