Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on History Of The Miranda Law. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
8 pages in length. The law, an ever-evolving concept, must uphold the rights of those it seeks to serve. Whether alleged offender or victim, the legal process is in place as a means by which to advocate the equity inherent to a civilized society. The Supreme Court has been an instrumental force in establishing the extent to which law enforcement must obey constitutional interpretation no differently than the alleged perpetrator; one area in which this ongoing process set a significant precedent ruling is with the Miranda law, which states even though an alleged perpetrator is caught with the evidence that, for example, might otherwise link him to a robbery, if he is not fully Mirandized before spontaneously giving his confession, it will ultimately – and lawfully – cause his declaration to be thrown out of court. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCMirandaLaw.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the equity inherent to a civilized society. The Supreme Court has been an instrumental force in establishing the extent to which law enforcement must obey constitutional interpretation no differently
than the alleged perpetrator; one area in which this ongoing process set a significant precedent ruling is with the Miranda law, which states even though an alleged perpetrator is caught
with the evidence that, for example, might otherwise link him to a robbery, if he is not fully Mirandized before spontaneously giving his confession, it will ultimately - and lawfully
- cause his declaration to be thrown out of court. "...Due to insufficient training, overzealousness or poor judgment, police sometimes step over the line when they think theyve got
someone who knows more than theyre saying...So they do what is necessary to get the confession and hope prosecutors can find some interpretation of Miranda law that will allow them
to use it" (Stacy, 2007). Several case decisions have made Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren a household name throughout the latter
part of the twentieth century. One that was particularly pertinent to each and every American was Miranda v. Arizona, which ruled that anyone who is considered to be a
criminal suspect must be informed of their constitutional rights prior to any legal inquiry. One of the primary purposes of this decision was to offer protection to those who
did not have the means by which to obtain counsel; if it was determined the suspect could not afford to hire private counsel, a representative of the court would come
to his or her defense. Along the same lines as the Miranda ruling, Mapp v. Ohio was instrumental in protecting the rights of those suspects who were incriminated by
...