Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on CENTER FOR THE DISABLED AND UNITE -- A NLRB CASE. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
                                            
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4-page paper discusses the case of Center for the Disabled and UNITE (Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees), processed by the NLRB, and whether or not the case was adequately adjudicated.
                                                
Page Count: 
                                                4 pages (~225 words per page)
                                            
 
                                            
                                                File: D0_MTdisuni.rtf
                                            
                                            Buy This Term Paper »
                                          
                                             
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
                                                    
                                                
                                                    for the Disabled and UNITE (Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile Employees), AFL-CIO, case 3-RC-11255.  1. Explain the procedure by which the case reached the Decision and Order level  
                                                
                                                    From the document itself, we can assume that elections were held to determine if UNITE could have a particular presence at this  
                                                
                                                    particular Employer. However, the employees wishing a union filed an objection concerning the conduct of the election, claiming that the conditions necessary for holding a fair election were not met.  
                                                
                                                    According to the NRLBs Web site, any party that makes the particular claim needs to present evidence to the local office of the NLRB. In this case, the NLRB investigates  
                                                
                                                    the issues, with an additional hearing conducted concerning the election.         In this case, we can assume that UNITE did, indeed, present its  
                                                
                                                    complaints to the local NRLB, and that there was a hearing on this particular issue. The hearing officer, we can assume, found against the plaintiffs, noting that the Employer was  
                                                
                                                    well within its rights to increase wages when it did.         The hearing officer, however, had overruled the unions objection that the election  
                                                
                                                    was not fair, and the NLRB determined that the officer applied the correct standard, in that the Employer had "established a valid business justification" when it came to both giving  
                                                
                                                    the wage increases as well as timing the announcement. The union, however, claimed that, in overruling its election, that the hearing officer ended up misapplying the NRLB law because the  
                                                
                                                    Employer had presented a legitimate reason for the wage increase. 2.  Who is issuing the Decision and Order?          The National  
                                                
                                                    ...