Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Should the President Be Able to Wiretap Without a Warrant?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper which argues that the President of the United States should not be able to wiretap someone without a warrant in order to protect the nation’s security. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAtpno.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
away the rights of American citizens under the excuse that it is for their own good, their own safety, and the safety of the nation. There are many freedoms that
have been taken away, most of which people have no idea about, as it involves a supposed effort to increase safety for the nation. Ultimately, however, they are nothing more
than infringements on the people and their freedoms, as well as ultimately lying as offenses against the Constitution of the United States. One issue, of late, involves the Presidents ability,
or inability, to wiretap without a warrant. The following paper argues that the President of the United States has no right to wiretap without a warrant. Should the
President Be Able to Wiretap Without a Warrant? In looking at this particular topic it is first imperative to note how President Bush has involved himself in such acts, and
how he claims that he has the right to do so. NPR (2007) states the following in this regard: "President Bush says he approved domestic spying on people with suspected
terrorist links without court warrants because it was a necessary part of my job to protect Americans from attack. At a press briefing, he said he would continue the program
as long as the country faced terrorist threats" (NPR, 2007). It appears that the Bush Administration has been involved in such action twice and they use "Congress Authorization for
Use of Military Force Resolution, passed Sept. 18, 2001" as proof that they can conduct themselves in this way (Quigley, 2007). In this authorization it was stated that the government
could use all and any force deemed necessary to catch those responsible for the attacks of 9/11 but as Congress noted, "We authorized the president to fight terrorists, not to
...