Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on PHILIPPA FOOT AND MORAL CONSIDERATIONS
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
                                            
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 7 page paper discusses the arguments of Philippa Foot toward a Kantian view of moral imperatives versus non-hypothetical categories. Bibliography lists 2 sources. 
                                                
Page Count: 
                                                7 pages (~225 words per page)
                                            
 
                                            
                                                File: D0_MBfoot.rtf
                                            
                                            Buy This Term Paper »
                                          
                                             
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
                                                    
                                                
                                                    Foot takes on Immanuel Kant in her "Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives". In doing so, though, are her views of moral considerations disruptive?  	Kant believed that morality  
                                                
                                                    consists solely of categorical imperatives and as such cannot posses any hypothetical imperatives. Simply put, non-hypothetical concerns, or categorical judgments tell a person what he or she needs to do.  
                                                
                                                    This is more or less a reflexive action and desires and wants do not enter into the picture to muddy the water, so to speak. For example, the idea that  
                                                
                                                    one should protect newborns is a generally accepted principle. This category does not revolve around what the helping person wants or desires, but simply states what must be done.  
                                                
                                                    However, imperatives are a means to an end, so to speak. For example: If I work hard, then I will have enough money to buy a car. Working hard is  
                                                
                                                    something that one should do, but with the qualifier of buy a car then a persons wants and desires enter into the equation. 	 	Foots argument is that morality falls  
                                                
                                                    under the category of the non-hypothetical judgment rather than the imperative. Her logic, of course, is to prove that there is no moral imperative by showing that morality is a  
                                                
                                                    non-hypothetical, because she is operating on the belief that non-hypothetical and imperatives cannot co-exist. This would seem to be disruptive to the idea of morality all together. 	 	Foot goes  
                                                
                                                    on to claim that the categorical use of the word should is not exclusive to morality, but crosses back and forth between the lines of morality and mere etiquette. Etiquette,  
                                                
                                                    Foot illustrates, is conditional to the culture and the geographical location of the individual. For example, shaking hands in the United States is a commonly accepted form of greeting while  
                                                
                                                    ...