Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Animal Experimentation: Views From Two Classical Ethics Theorists. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. The ethical nature of animal experimentation has long been debated as to whether or not it stands as a necessary element for humanity. After all, the primary -- if not only -- reason animals are utilized in laboratory tests is to further the interests of mankind, often without the least bit of concern for the animals who forfeit their lives in exchange for medical, cosmetic and household product advancements. Classical ethics theorists Emile Durkheim and Immanual Kant may have had similar viewpoints on some issues, but when it came to concerns over the ethical fortitude of animal experimentation, the writer discusses how Durkheim would have befriended the animals' plight long before Kant would have, who adopted a utilitarian concept. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCexper.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
for humanity. After all, the primary -- if not only -- reason animals are utilized in laboratory tests is to further the interests of mankind, often without the least
bit of concern for the animals who forfeit their lives in exchange for medical, cosmetic and household product advancements. Classical ethics theorists Emile Durkheim and Immanuel Kant may have
had similar viewpoints on some issues, but when it came to concerns over the ethical fortitude of animal experimentation, it can be argued that Durkheim would have befriended the animals
plight long before Kant would have, who adopted a utilitarian concept. When assessing these concerns, it is important for one to consider the
fact that utilitarianism represents the "belief that what serves the greatest number serves the greater good" (London A12), rather than what is favorable for a few; indeed, this has a
great deal to do with the idea of sacrificing a lesser being for the better of the superior being. With that in mind, one can easily see how animal
experimentation and utilitarianism may not have the most harmonious relationship. Ethically speaking, a single entity cannot begin to know what is for the good of the majority when it
comes to the living world as a whole, inasmuch as species perceive issues of control in significantly different ways. If utilitarianism is, indeed, wrapped around the concept of emotion
instead of common sense, it is important for one to realize the fact that any form of animal experimentation that is promoted by utilitarians comes not from their desire to
better the world for everyone, but rather to improve it as a means by which to appease the majority. In its raw form,
...