Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Power of the Government to Use GPS Tracking. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper concludes that in today's world, the "law and order" society prevails, and those who scream for individual and privacy rights are not heard. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RG13_SA1129gps.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
people are entitled to privacy today, but it is difficult to attain. People are spammed. Their identities are stolen online for even a short time as people receive emails from
their friends that are actually forwarded by unscrupulous spammers. The very recent case of a Rutgers student who seemingly killed himself in response to a sex tape brings the point
home. Privacy is difficult to attain. Yet, should government make use of new technology to further intrude on the lives of individuals? For the most part, police or government agencies
require a search warrant to provide surveillance, but a recent case suggests that this is no longer the case, at least in certain states. Cohen (2010) explains: "Government agents can
sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesnt violate
your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway - and no reasonable expectation that the government isnt tracking your movements."
Cohen (2010) is not being sarcastic and he does go on to say that the whole situation is bizarre. He explains that the ruling is applicable to nine Western states,
including California (Cohen, 2010). This is because a decision rendered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth circuit covers that region of the country (Cohen, 2010). The case
that started this all is attached to a DEA case in 2007 when Juan Pineda-Moreno was suspected of growing marijuana (Cohen, 2010). Agents used GPS to track his movements (Cohen,
2010). Of course, the argument in the case was that the man had an expectation of privacy that includes the idea that government agents were not allowed to sneak onto
...