Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on The Ethics of Spamming. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 4 page paper discussing a Web-based interactive survey of the ethics of spamming, followed by implications of ethical behavior in the electronic environment. Increasing numbers of regulations against spam make it more difficult to continue to spam individuals, but real change can occur only with individuals choosing against its use. There are many ways that electronic commerce has changed the ways we conduct business, but other developments serve to confirm why pre-Internet “rules” came to be and why they continue to be sound. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSitSpamEth.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the Interactive Computer Ethics Explorer (ICEE) (http://www.cs.bgsu.edu/maner/xxicee/html/icee.htm) provides a scenario describing a frustrated authors attempt to sell a self-published crime novel by spamming newsgroups for the purpose of offering the
book for sale. The site provides 20 questions and immediate results of the answers of the most recent 50 individuals to answer the questions. The purpose here is
to assess an individuals responses compared to those of others, and to discuss results of the exercise relative to expectations of conduct supported by the British Computer Society. The Exercise
The first question of the exercise states, "Advertisers like Jules have the same right as any other user to post messages," which superficially
can appear to be true. Of the last 50 users to answer the question, fully 50 percent either disagreed (21 people) or strongly disagreed (4 respondents). Nine were
undecided; only 16 agreed with the statement in any degree. Question 3 asks the user to rate the statement, "People like Jules should
be put on a well-publicized blacklist for a few months." This could be tempting, but such an action carries with it immense opportunity for abuse. It also would
be unforgiving for those who may have acted without fully thinking through their actions. Nineteen people disagreed (12 generally, 7 strongly) with the statement, but 22 agreed with it,
4 strongly. Nine were undecided. If those agreeing with the statement thought of the implications associated with the act of censuring individuals, some may choose to change their
responses to the statement. In response to Question 5, only 2 of 42 (8 abstained) individuals agreed with the statement, "Spamming the world
...