Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Oedipus/Opinions on Guilt. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page essay that examines various perspectives on the guilt and innocence of Oedipus in the play by Sophocles. The writer examines several of these arguments, concluding that the ones favoring the viewpoint that Oedipus was guilty make the best argument. No bibliographical information available.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khoedart.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
- properly! Sophocles tale of horror and tragedy, which is the story of Oedipus the King, was
penned several thousand years ago, yet the moral complexity of this ancient Greek play is such that scholars are still debating the guilt, or innocence, of the protagonist. The following
discussion examines several different viewpoints, illustrating that there can be greatly divergent perspectives on the complicity of Oedipus in meeting his fate. However, an analysis of these perspectives shows that
those favoring Oedipus guilt make the most sense. J.T. Sheppard sides with those who protest Oedipus innocence. Sheppard states that the enlightened man of Sophocles era, as would "an
enlightened man of our own day," believe that the "ignorance of Oedipus absolves him from all blame" (191-192). While Sheppard upholds Oedipus innocence, he also grants that it was "natural
and right" for Oedipus to feel terrible remorse when he learned the truth, experiencing an instinctive sense of shame and anguish (192). Sheppard is referring, of course, to the fact
that Oedipus committed his grievous sins of patricide and incest in ignorance, not knowing the true identities of his biological mother and father. As Sheppard explores the ramifications of
Oedipus innocence, his argument draws in aspects of how the Greeks regarded the nature of the gods. Prior to the "enlightenment" period in Greek history, it appears that the Greeks
regarded their gods as responsible for doing evil in the world as for doing good. In other words, the capricious way that life can bestow either fortune or disaster was
seen as a direct result of divine intervention. Therefore, Sheppard argues that poets "who died before the great enlightenment...It was quite possible for a Greek to believe that certain conduct
...