Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Has Geoeconomics Replaced Geostrategy?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper contends that geoeconomics has replaced geostrategy, at least ideologically. The cold war is seen as a precursor to the modern world order where indeed geoeconomics is at the forefront. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA016geo.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
stock market plunge than the physical vulnerability of the United States. And President Clintons actions, negating the threat of China and instead bringing up less serious problems, is evidence of
this perspective. Yes, all wars have been fought on foreign soil so American citizens have no fear of missiles or bombs dropping from the sky. Instead, they watch bombs being
dropped on helpless people on their now huge television boxes which helps to alleviate some of the fear associated with war. Today, war is entertainment. Of course, the change in
perspective did not happen overnight. Thomas L. Friedman suggests that globalization had replaced the cold war. Clearly, this change is at least partly responsible for the overall shift in thought.
It is important however to explore the details of why theorists do feel that geopolitics have shifted to allow economics to take over. Some say that into the twenty-first century,
geopolitics must yield to geoeconomics (Stewart and Sookdeo 70). Edward and Luttwak of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, who coined the word geoeconomics
say: "the firepower is capital, market penetration replaces foreign bases and garrisons, and so it goes: The equivalents of strategic nuclear weapons, which is to say the super powerful weapons
that are dangerous to use, are things like industrial and investment policies. The everyday tool, powerful but enormously more flexible, is market access "(70). That might be true up to
a point. Money runs the world, but one can also say that human life is invaluable. No one can put a price on safety. By not looking at true
threats to the nation, as one sees a sophisticated world of connected computers and global corporations, people are not being realistic. Stewart and Sookdeo do acknowledge that there are some
...