Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Different Viewpoints Regarding Prospero in Shakespeare's The Tempest. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper evaluates a portion of the work that involves Prospero. How Prospero sees himself, how the audience views him and how other characters--particularly Ferdinand--view him is the focus of this paper. No additional sources cited.
5 pages (~225 words per page)
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and mysterious island. This Shakespearean work is a tale about a shipwrecked man and his quest for revenge much later on. By the time that Miranda is all grown up
and ready to marry, things take a turn and important to this Shakespearean play is the fact that Prospero takes revenge on three men he holds responsible for his fate.
Ironically, it is one of these mens sons who falls in love with Prosperos now grown daughter. Of course, in reading and comprehending this work, it is important to look
at perspectives. While Prospero sees things one way, certainly Miranda will see them another as will Antonio and Fernando. How the characters view what is occurring, and how the audience
views them, is relevant to this work. Act IV, Scene I in Shakespeares The Tempest begins with Prosperos words, as follows: "If I have too austerely punishd you, Your compensation
makes amends, for I Have given you here a third of mine own life, Or that for which I live; who once again I tender to thy hand. All thy
vexations Were but my trials of thy love, and thou Hast strangely stood the test. Here, afore Heaven, I ratify this my rich gift. O Ferdinand, Do not smile at
me that I boast her off, For thou shalt find she will outstrip all praise And make it halt behind her" (Shakespeare 444). Prospero is apologizing to Ferdinand, or
at least that is how he sees it. In his apology, he makes reference to a variety of his own actions, and the audience is privy to what he has
done. Yet, in interpreting Shakespeare, it is easy to provide one interpretation based on events in the play in respect to the obvious meaning of the rhetoric. Yet, it is