Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Capital Punishment Related To Juvenile Crime. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The recent incidence of juvenile killers has brought to light a concern that has long challenged the fundamental components of a civilized society: Should adolescents who commit murder be sentenced to death the same as their adult counterparts? While some contend that permitting capital punishment blatantly violates both international law and constitutionality – asserting juveniles are often a product of their adverse environments and, therefore, should be given extensive behavioral therapy in order to assimilate back into society – others argue that adolescents who have not yet learned the difference between right and wrong should no longer be allowed to function as a civilized human being. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCJuvCP.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
as their adult counterparts? While some contend that permitting capital punishment blatantly violates both international law (Wheaton-Rodriguez, 2001) and constitutionality (Lechner, 1996) - asserting juveniles are often a product
of their adverse environments and, therefore, should be given extensive behavioral therapy in order to assimilate back into society - others argue that adolescents who have not yet learned the
difference between right and wrong should no longer be allowed to function as a civilized human being. "As the law currently stands, the juvenile death penalty is constitutionally permissible,
but it is clear that it has no impact on reducing violent juvenile crime" (Lechner, 1996, p. 113). The age-old adage of an
eye for an eye is still relevant in much of contemporary society, particularly with regard to the death penalty. The issue of juvenile capital punishment, however, is perhaps one
of the most hotly contested of all contemporary controversial issues; while some believe that one who kills should pay his debt to society with his own life, others contend that
two wrongs -- in the case of executing a juvenile murderer -- do not make a right. The fact that an adolescent believes he can take the life of
another without reciprocal discipline is a concept many find difficult to grasp, a point well taken in Ernest van den Haags In Defense of the Death Penalty: A Practical and
Moral Analysis. Viewers who witness the reality each and every night on their television newscasts are mentally and emotionally pummeled with stories of innocent people being murdered by juveniles.
Sometimes there is a motive, other times the killing is for no other reason than because someone thought he had the right. Yet while van den Haag (1978)
...