Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on CULTURAL RELATIVISM ACCORDING TO JAMES RACHELS. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper examines the theories of cultural relativism as explained by James Rachels. Issues covered include definition and examples of relativism, arguments for and against relativism, and comparison/contrast to absolutism. Quotes given from the text and cited. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_MBculrach.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
it would be seen as frivolous at best as the truth according to many cultural relativists is what one makes it out to be. Cultural relativism is
the position that all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual and his or her environment. In other words, anything can be
called a truth as long as it is an integral part of ones cultural aspects, including heritage, religion and form of rule. James Rachels, a Professor of Philosophy at the
University of Birmingham, in his paper, The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, explores some of the issues associated with cultural relativism and why cultural relativism is what actually has allowed mankind
to survive and adapt over the centuries. One of the main arguments espoused by Rachel is that cultural relativism challenges the ethics
of morals(Rachels, 2002). In other words he is stating that cultural relativism is a theory about morality in a culture and how it cannot be standardized in a one size
fits all category. Of course, cultural relativism is appropriate in some respects. For example, food, clothing, language, and driving rules are different
within cultures, and its important that these relative differences remain. However, he goes on to criticize, these are not issues of universal "right" and "wrong." These are not matters of
mathematical certainty. These are not issues of "truth." In a relativistic society, we have no right to judge or punish anyone. Right and wrong are now defined by socialization. Society
changes and morality becomes a moving target. In truth, if the standard of right and wrong is based on relativism, then society has no standards at all. The assumptions
...