Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Are Judges Unnecessary in Criminal Law?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper considers the question of whether or not judges are an anachronism and community panels should replace judges. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: AM2_PP684389.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
listed below. Citation styles constantly change, and these examples may not contain the most recent updates. Are Judges Unnecessary in Criminal Law Research
Compiled by 12/2010 Please For
all of its faults and shortcomings, the American legal system is the best in the world. That system revolves around two primary players when it comes to criminal sentencing.
These players are the judge that presides over the case and the jury that is assigned to weigh out the evidence. Not all criminal cases, however, go before
a jury. Many go before a judge alone. This is true despite the fact that there has been a movement in recent years advocating that community and neighborhood
boards or panels are a more appropriate sentencing mechanism. Some even contend that judges are anachronistic, that they should be replaced with community boards and panels. This paper,
however, will argue that our system is best left unchanged. Both juries and judges have their place in American criminal justice. There
are distinct differences between judges and those that comprise juries or even the neighborhood boards and panels that some recommend as a replacement for the trial judge. Judges are
trained to do what they do. They go through years of schools and work in the legal profession before they ever don the black robe and take their seat
behind the courtroom podium. Jurors (or panel members), in contrast, are the typical Joe on the street. They may be highly educated as well but it is unlikely
...