Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on 1996 Personal Responsibility & Work Opportunity Act. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. New Jersey's black Democratic Senator Wayne Bryant was instrumental in implementing the family cap legislation that removed a woman's ability to receive welfare benefits for her illegitimate children. It has been called groundbreaking in the way in which it attacked what lawmakers labeled a significant source of poverty within the eastern state. According to Bryant, the primary focus of the reform was to reestablish family values. The writer discusses the welfare reform law as it relates to New Jersey. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Welfarnj.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
in the way in which it attacked what lawmakers called a significant source of poverty within the eastern state. According to Bryant, the primary focus of the reform was
to reestablish family values. "Until the needs and the problems of the family are confronted in a comprehensive way, welfare will continue its course of entrapping one generation after
the next in a modern form of slavery" (Marshall, 1995, p. PG). However, has such a drastic measure to reduce the burden upon the welfare system been effectual, or has
it merely caused even more problems with regard to poverty, unemployment and the devaluation of the New Jersey family? There is no doubt that the influence of this monumental
reform law has had a positive impact upon the welfare system of New Jersey. Statistics have demonstrated that since the reform was implemented, there has been a significant decline
in the number of babies born to welfare mothers. This was one of the principal goals the family cap sought to achieve. Indeed, the drop is "powerful proof"
(Marshall, 1995, p. PG) that women on welfare, unlike prior claims to the opposite, are fully capable of "governing their own decisions (p. PG). Estimates place the decline at
approximately twenty percent, according to Heritage Foundations Robert Rector. However, in spite of the fact that the numbers did, indeed, decrease, Bryant says that implementing the family cap was
a reform action long overdue. Rector agrees supporting it "simply because its morally correct" (Marshall, 1995, p. PG). While the New Jersey Department of Human Services offers a considerably
lower estimate of eleven point four percent, it is still clear that the reform has proven two key beliefs that have to do with welfare issues: that money serves to
...