Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Use of Interrogatories in North Carolina. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper examining the use of interrogatories as specifically stated in a North Carolina law. The laws of North Carolina are highly specific in the rules governing the entire discovery process and the use of interrogatories, however. An example statute that specifically mentions the use of interrogatories is Session Law 2001-121, House Bill 434, which gives plaintiff attorneys the right to use ten interrogatories in addition to the 50 allowed by North Carolina general statute law. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSncInterrogs.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
an ordinary citizen responding to the discovery process, it seems as though there are no limits at all and that no subject is off limits. The laws of North
Carolina are highly specific in the rules governing the entire discovery process and the use of interrogatories, however. An example statute that specifically mentions the use of interrogatories is
Session Law 2001-121, House Bill 434. Session Law 2001-121, House Bill 434 This bill is an act to amend Rule 9(J) of the
rules of civil procedure as they directly relate to complaints of medical malpractice. The act alters the use of interrogatories but is targeted to "clarifying which judge may sign
orders extending the statute of limitations in certain cases as recommended by the civil litigation study commission" (Session Law 2001-121, House Bill 434).
The text of the act refers to G.S. 90-21.11 for a legal definition of medical malpractice and definition of applicable standard of care in G.S. 90-21.12, warning that any such
case will be dismissed unless the complaint meets three conditions listed in the text of the act. It further lists some of the
responsibilities of the plaintiff, which includes the use of interrogatories associated with the complaint. The bill reads, "The plaintiff shall provide, at the request of the defendant, proof of
compliance with this subsection through up to ten written interrogatories, the answers to which shall be verified by the expert required under this subsection. These interrogatories do not count against
the interrogatory limit under Rule 33" (Session Law 2001-121, House Bill 434). The effect that this has is to make available for defense
...