Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Hartley And Medley Cases: Accountability Revisions In The Behavioral Health System. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. The precedence setting ability of court cases has enacted tremendous change where change was badly needed. At the top of this list of legal revisions reside the Hartley and Medley cases, which served as the catalysts for revising the behavioral health system so accountability is a more visible component. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCHartley.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Hartley and Medley cases, which served as the catalysts for revising the behavioral health system so accountability is a more visible component. From
the two aforementioned cases, developmentally disabled or mentally retarded children and adults are provided with services necessary to help them mainstream into their own communities. The Hartley Advocacy program
helps developmentally disabled or mentally retarded adults and children acclimate to all the subtle and not-so-subtle aspects of living amidst society, assistance that is received via behavioral health centers.
Similarly, the Medley Advocacy program focuses upon institutionalized children and young adults receiving community-based services (West Virginia Advocates, 2001). These West Virginia court orders have been instrumental in revising behavioral
health systems by enabling developmentally disabled or mentally retarded individuals to become at least partly accountable for their daily existence. What was termed permanent institutionalization" was cause for these
decrees in the first place, bring to light the detrimental impact of being warehoused for the rest of their already-compromised lives. Instead, it was deemed much healthier and humane
for these individuals to "be integrated into the community in the least restrictive environment in which they could successfully function" (Bailey, 2002). One viable solution to the new approach was
creating group homes where several developmentally disabled or mentally retarded could live in the same residence with proper guidance from trained adults. Initially state funded, these group homes soon
lost their financial backing due to deficient budgets; as such, the introduction of Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mental Retarded - ICFs/MR took place, a solution funded by
Medicaid; however, the law draws a distinction for this type of long-term facility, with on of the descriptive phrases used being the word institution. This realization went completely against
...