Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Canadian Supreme Court: Murdoch V. Murdoch And Moge V. Moge / Evolution Of The Interpretation Of Marriage Breakdown. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
11 pages in length. The writer offers overviews and judgments for the two Canadian cases, as well as discusses what evolution has taken place with regard to an individual's contribution to marriage. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
11 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCcourt.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
female equality. Mrs. Murdoch believed wholeheartedly that because she was a contributing factor -- both in money and labor -- to the ranch that was only in her husbands
name, she was rightfully due her portion of the beneficial interest. In light of the fact that Mrs. Murdoch was not going to allow her husband to keep the
property as his own, she filed a petition as a means by which to acquire what she deemed her fair share of what had been procured between them while in
the state of matrimony. Not only was the ranch in her just her husbands name, but all of the couples other valuable assets, as well. Mrs. Murdoch had
no inkling that a lifetime of devotion to the institution of marriage would render her helpless when it came to divvying up the couples material possessions.1 At issue was the
concept of equitable distribution when it had been proven that one partys contribution, although important in other areas of the marriage, did not constitute a financial supplementation. Was Mrs.
Murdoch truly worthy of half of everything even though she no monetary support toward the items the way her husband did? That is precisely what the Supreme Court had
to determine when deciding whether or not economic contribution had any bearing on equitable distribution. As it turns out, the ruling came down that common law dictates the property
acquired by a married couple is still considered as being two separate estates, rendering the party defenseless to claim part ownership if there is only one name on the property.
In spite of the fact that Mrs. Murdoch provided for her husband and the marriage in other ways besides economic support, she was not to be considered even a
...