Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Boeing v Airbus: Government Subsides and International Relations. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page overview of the recent introductions these companies have made to the industry. This paper discusses the controversy presented by government subsidies. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: AM2_PPaircraftGovSub.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
those events have occurred in response to the economic challenges the industry has faced. Even in light of those challenges, significant accomplishments have been made. Not only have
existing aircraft been improved and new ones released, the industry itself has implemented internal strategies that keep them competitive even during these challenging economic times. Airbus and Boeing are
particularly illustrative in this regard. The internal strategies implemented by Boeing and Airbus have coupled with such factors as government subsidies
to allow them to not only keep their individual heads above water but to become one anothers primary competitor. As a consequence of this competition and the governments varying
role in the two companies successes, a debate has emerged as to whether government subsidies have been just and if, in fact, they should continue.
Airbus it seems has benefited considerably more from government subsidies than has Boeing. Boeing, on the other hand, has relied more on internal strategy to
keep the company afloat. The battle has been a long and hard one. No individual company could challenge Boeings dominance until four countries in Europe entered into a
consortium and established Airbus Industries. The creation of Airbus Industries came at a particularly critical time for Boeing. In August,
1997, Boeing completed a merger with another commercial jet plane manufacturer, McDonnel-Douglas Aircraft Company. This merger came at a time when Boeing began to experience difficulties in production due
to parts shortages, assembly line congestion and other delays which caused schedules to fall behind. The newly merged company, however, took several necessary steps to stay afloat. Those
...